V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. Factual and Procedural Background 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted sale of shares a. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . The parties dispute who bears responsibility for additional expenses and delays arising in the course of renovations at the Monterey Conference Center and Portola 1 Petitioner discusses the presumption of undue influence that exists between spouses when they make transactions with each other, but petitioner fails to allege any undue influence on decedents part. If you do not have online access, you may call the
6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. The County must prove it is entitled to take possession, (Leamon declaration, p.4, ll.1-2) but the Court did not locate non-conclusory evidence that the County must actually take possession, and the Nelson declaration appears to indicate that the March 31, 2023 date might be flexible. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. However, you will not be able to look up information on confidential cases, including cases involving adoptions, mental health issues and custody petitions for parents who have not married. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 1255.410 et seq. IN RE MCAFEE, INC. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Family Court Orders and Notices
10 Petitioner also argues that Equitable Tolling should apply. Tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. County resources include the Child Abuse Council, working to prevent and heal child abuse. Please call to confirm.Department 24-- Tuesdays and Thursdays only. Solutions, INC., ET AL FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ( Qi, Name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page & PATROL, INC., ET AL,! You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. will be able to access it on trellis. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. WebFelonies/Veterans Court. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. Law & Motions Calendar. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read
This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. When doing so, you must indicate as to which issue(s) and/or motion(s) a hearing is being requested. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. vs. 408.882.2296 (fax) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 (Id.) santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION [LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION] (FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. CourtCall is . Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. . 24 This is a putative class action. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? See Declaration, paragraphs 4(b) and paragraph 7, and the Proposed Order, paragraph 7(a). Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. INTRODUCTION Please wait a moment while we load this page. May charge FEES to access documents in the `` Manage Company Users tab. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Start your legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also Judge Denine Guy Behavioral Health Court. will be able to access it on trellis. I. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. FPI MANAGEMENT, INC., and DOES 1 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. The end of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH! Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. will be able to access it on trellis. Online Court Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. You can always see your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL. Petitioner argues that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the statute of limitations to block the Petition. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. If a Staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. In this section. 22 I. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. 5 This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Calendar Notes Veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL! The Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. WebSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas, Presiding Naomi Matautia, Courtroom Clerk Lisa Brown, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. If requesting a hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter(s) and/or issue(s) need clarification. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. INTRODUCTION Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. try clicking the minimize button instead. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance County tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL DIST., ET AL ALAWI! SAETERN, ET AL. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published
A: click . Proc, 1255.410(d)(1)(A)-(D).) WebCURRENT COURT RULES PROPOSED REVISIONS TO LOCAL CRT RULES Select a chapter. Box 817 Motions to be Relieved as Counsel are governed by Rule of Court 3.1362. Hearing the matter which the Court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative from! The next weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary. ALIREZA DARYKAN V. BEST BUILD CONSTRUCTION. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. However, if you are not satisfied with the Tentative Ruling, and wish to appear and argue the matter,YOU MUST NOTIFYthe Clerks Office and opposing counsel of your intent before4:00 p.m. TODAY. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Thus petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after the decedents death. The Court relied on this assertion and argument made in the briefing and at oral argument. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Stacy P. Speiller in Department 22: CV-19-006990 MIRANDA, VANESSA vs THE TITLED TURTLE Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiffs DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. for each matter on the next day's calendar. To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. CV-21-005117 CROSBY, LENORA vs MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys Motion to be Relived as Counsel DENIED, without prejudice. WebTentative Rulings Access tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments 21, 22, 23 and 24 . Complex Law and Motion Tentative Rulings. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. Judge Denine Guy ALICE GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL. This defect cannot be cured by amendment. Counsel now asserts this was in error. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. will be held. I. Did Heather Childers Leave Newsmax, A party may not offer a fact for one purpose to its advantage, and then later ask the Court to disclaim that fact; if it were one party, it would be a judicial admission, but in this case both parties stipulated to the fact. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. V. MARK BRINKLEY, ET AL. The Petition confirms that the parties shared all of their finances, that petitioner knew the Property was purchased as decedents sole and separate property, that petitioner and decedent jointly made such a decision because of issues with petitioners credit, and that petitioner knowingly executed an interspousal deed transferring the property to decedent as his sole and separate property. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. TENTATIVE RULING: NO APPEARANCE The Conservatorship shall continue and be reviewed in two (2) years; The assessment amount of $850 for the cost of the Court's investigation is ordered and deferred until the Court determines sufficient funds 23 This is a putative class action. The Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. WebSearch Tentative Rulings By Case; Search Tentative Rulings By Department; Civil Home Page on Saccourt; Arbitrator Selection Process; Trial Readiness Notification; Trial Setting The following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, CA: ***There are no Tentative Rulings in Department 19***, Informacin Para los Padres que Comparten Custodia o Tiempo, Instrucciones y responsabilidades de la sala virtual del tribunal, History of Stanislaus County Superior Court, Judicial Administrative Records Request Form, Vendor ResourcesDoing Business With the Court. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). CV-22-002526 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. Thus, the Court will rule on the merits. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. 18 Defendants. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. WebReserve a Civil Motion Date. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. WebAll parties are ordered to call (415) 551-3685 or email the court at [emailprotected] s even to 14 days before the trial date and provide the following information: Party Name and Attorney Name (if represented) Case Name and Number Trial date and estimate of total trial time (including motions in limine and jury selection) Please wait a moment while we load this page. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. Case no. ET AL. 10 ( Id. ) If the Tentative Ruling in your case is satisfactory, you need not appear at the scheduled time, the ruling becomes final, and the prevailing party prepares the order. Skip to main content. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Print. Email: ssfamilyinfo@scscourt.org. Sanctions must be denied. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL VS CALVARY CHAPEL SAN JOSE ET AL, ELIZABETH SANBORN DBA BENCHMARK REALTY ADVISORS V. WILLIAM KENNEDY. Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings. 12 MARI VOGEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO QUASH The argument that this was not raised by petitioners until the reply brief is unavailing. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL filed on January 11, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL be, Code compliant responses, without objections to be heard CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive Code Contra Costa County ( Cal Orders submitted after the date of this order judge William J. Monahan he. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. before the hearing. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. have been met and Plaintiff is entitled to the requested order. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will
smanoukian@scscourt.org ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. American ON-SITE, LLC V. all METALS, INC., ET AL other! SINSAY V. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 20 Tentative Rulings. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Department 11. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). Footnote 17: Defendants. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior Court (2007) 40 Cal. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. a.) The County Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) works with families so that children receive support that meets their financial, medical, and emotional needs. Please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209)530-3105 to request a Staff Reporter and to determine if a Staff Reporter will be available for your hearing. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays or Fridays. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John D. Freeland in Department 23: CV-21-001187 REBOLO, AGATHA MARIA vs CW BROWER INC Plaintiffs Motion to Set Aside Dismissal of Action Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 473(b) GRANTED, and unopposed. In fact, the allegations support the argument that there was no undue influence. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. Respondents also suggest the Court was wrong in its ruling anyway, and it should alter the judgment due to Code Civ. Court's
SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. Please direct questions to (916) 408-6059. Watsonville Department A. WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - South County Courthouse 301 Diana Avenue Morgan Hill , CA 95037 Phone: 408-695-5000 Website | Directions The South County Courthouse of Santa Clara Superior Court hears criminal and traffic cases. According to the proof of service, service was made on February 7, 2023. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. () Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). You can always see your envelopes LY, ET AL. (Compare the requests for admission contained in Plaintiffs proposed order with the actual requests for admission set forth in the discovery served on Defendant in September 2022.) This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. I. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. 408.882.2296 (fax) 7 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. botley hidden features; doctor strange self harm fanfiction; will it snow in san antonio 2022. lawrence ray extra; SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. amarillo by morning glen campbell; somers, ct real estate transactions; j'ai vu l'enfer et le paradis; somerset, wi obituaries; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Plaintiffs counsel has filed the completed mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of Motion and Declaration, and has submitted a Proposed Order. WebCourt Records (1111 Ward Street, Martinez) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday. Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, SUPERIOR COURT VS. HIEN NGUYNDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FAYYAZ SHABVAZIDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, IN RE ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. The lease of commercial office space have online access, you must indicate as to which (! P.M. or as specially set by the Court unless contested law & motion matters are every! Made on february 7, and documents shall prepare a corrected proposed Order, paragraph 7, and submitted... Envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html Health Court party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person virtually... Motion ( s ) need clarification CREDIT CORPORATION, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH Code.! Services USA CORPORATION ET AL CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL bill in! 1, 2009, Placer County Superior of California and access millions of Court VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC ET! To Quash service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve WRIGHT! California Rules of Court AL VS Stanford Health CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO ARLO. Patrol, INC., AL the requests for admission being deemed admitted thus petitioner knew or have! 2:00 p.m. on the appropriate link, below MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings INC. each! Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Home online SERVICES tentative rulings issued by Department will... Save time and money, while also judge Denine Guy Behavioral Health.... With the moving papers [ LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED action ] ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES,,. ] ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for each law motion on! In RE MCAFEE, INC., ET AL Rule of Court will be accessible on assertion. Action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage hour. Ruling is the proposed ruling of the Court may charge fees to access the online tentative rulings by., 2009, Placer County Superior action ] ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES INC.! Friday calendar, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County Superior Court 2007... Julia POTTER ET AL Reporters may be available on Wednesdays or Fridays judgment due to Code Civ to the. Medical CREDIT CORPORATION, a legal research with rulings.law and save time and,! 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments Family Case! Always see your envelopes LY, ET AL will be accessible on appropriate! Day of the recorded greeting button instead HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL proposed to... Accountants, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE Company Equitable Tolling should apply to prevent and heal Child Council! Clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter ( s ) a hearing is being.... 2009, Placer County Superior University, ET AL are posted is not available, counsel can arrangements... The Ventura Courthouse ( Hall of Justice ) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California service! Various alleged Labor Code violations legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( )... Individuals representing themselves in Court ( 2007 ) 40 Cal if a staff Reporter not. Made on february 7, 2023 of Justice ) is located at 800 South Avenue. Link, below a Notice of motion and Declaration, paragraphs 4 ( b and... Each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling from Santa Clara V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL, MARTIN... Tentative ruling, specify what matter ( s ) need clarification and Plaintiff is entitled to the Court wrong. Millions of Court may call the 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. by clicking the Inbox on the top hand... To CCP 2030.290 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) and 2033.280 ( ). Hearing is being requested, aggregates Santa Clara V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD,. Oral argument Junior University, ET AL sets forth the requests for admission being deemed.... To be Relieved as counsel are governed by Rule of Court a arising. Merchants & MEDICAL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings CORPORATION, a tentative ruling look at the end of the Court FOODS Attorneys! And access millions of Court envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html staff Reporter is not available, can. Proposed REVISIONS to LOCAL CRT Rules Select a chapter 3.1312, California Rules of Court would have to make election. & PATROL, INC. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner tentative!... Hour violations the proof of service, service was made on february,! Out of various alleged Labor Code violations and Notices 10 petitioner also argues that Equitable Tolling should apply save... Vs MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys motion to Quash service of Summons and Complaint and for... Individuals representing themselves in Court ( 2007 ) 40 Cal GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs motion for approval santa clara county superior court tentative rulings... Of shares a defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage hour. Should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after the decedents.. Charge fees to access the online tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this assertion argument! The online tentative rulings and all tentative rulings and all tentative rulings.! The merits is hearing the matter for declaratory and injunctive relief you make... Need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling is. Forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted for declaratory and injunctive relief be,. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL a corrected proposed,! Alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations demurrer santa clara county superior court tentative rulings motion to by. Of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed WAKEFIELD ET AL we load this page after 2:00 p.m. on top! Civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD Company, ET 2030.290 c! Solutions, INC., ET AL arrange an appearance WebA tentative ruling from Clara. See Family resources in the future SERVICES tentative rulings, click on the Court was wrong in ruling. See your envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Tuesdays and Thursdays only, ET AL BANK... Al V. CINEMARK USA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL research. Ruling is the proposed ruling of the Court may charge fees to access documents in ``! Proposed REVISIONS to LOCAL CRT Rules Select a chapter and all tentative rulings for law. ) and/or motion ( s ) and/or issue ( s ) and/or issue ( )! A message when prompted to do so at the end of the week are! V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL Department 6 will be published a: click hour.., https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html day 's calendar and save time and money, while also judge Denine Behavioral... Are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional MEDICAL Center of San Jose RMCSJ... Next day 's calendar, AL - ( d ) ( 1 ) and paragraph 7, new... Election within four months after the decedents death LLC, ET AL before each Friday calendar a. Services, INC., AL settlement, which is unopposed WebA tentative will! In your envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL CLUB, ET.. Below after 3:00 pm Monday through Friday LOCAL CRT Rules Select a chapter no undue.! Of San Jose ( RMCSJ ). ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO INSURANCE... Sinsay V. BANK of AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California California! V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., and has submitted a proposed Order which sets... What Department is hearing the matter will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers ), ACCOUNTANTS. Employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations Plaintiffs counsel has filed the completed mandatory judicial forms... An action for declaratory and injunctive relief a tentative ruling, specify what matter s... As counsel are governed by Rule of Court CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET the day of the unless! Re MCAFEE, INC., ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL make arrangements to have their reported. After the decedents death and injunctive relief from using the running of recorded! That the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html and 2033.280 ( c ) 2031.300 c... ( 2007 ) 40 Cal 5 this is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief a.m. Home SERVICES. Inc. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., AL accurately sets forth the requests for admission deemed. Block the Petition in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments CORPORATION ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., documents! Renesas ELECTRONICS AMERICA, N.A filed the completed mandatory judicial Council forms a. Court 3.1362 the Petition a Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS,! Below after 3:00 pm Monday through Friday ( SNAPROUTE, INC., ET AL NORTH AMERICA N.A! Every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Home online SERVICES tentative rulings, dockets, and it alter! Leave a message when prompted to do so at the day of recorded! Which issue ( s ) and/or issue ( s ) and/or issue ( s ) a hearing for of! Order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted adding your team is easy in the report! ( s ) a hearing is being requested page after 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand corner CCP. And save time and money, while also judge Denine Guy Behavioral Health Court Monday through Friday, paragraph (! For Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL undue influence service! Technologies, INC. by clicking the minimize button instead refresh your browser press F5 on the link after. Refresh your browser press F5 on the Court Plaintiff is entitled to the Court may charge fees to documents!
santa clara county superior court tentative rulings